Mine, Your's and God's Business

I recently learned a concept that has helped with understanding and implementing assertiveness and boundaries, as well as decreasing anxiety and frustration around attempting to change things we have no control over. It’s called, “The Three Types of Business”, by Byron Katie. 

Essentially, there are three types of business: God’s, your’s (other’s) and mine. If you don’t believe in God, think of it as something bigger than or outside of humanity. God’s business includes things humanity does not have control over, such as, your height, physicality, what era and family you were born into, the weather, sickness, life or death. Your/other’s business is how other people choose to make sense of their life story. This includes their actions, behaviour, beliefs and political stance. My business is similar to your business however pertains to myself. So, how I make sense of my world, deal with my issues, my spiritual and politics stance. We often get upset/frustrated/annoyed when we try to control God’s and the business of other people. 

Here is an example. As I write this, snow is blowing horizontally across my window, visibility is low as is the contrast of the outside world which has only shades of white and grey present. It looks cold and icy out. I’m aware that I’m a little annoyed and disappointed with myself that I didn’t buy chocolate chips and milk when I was at the store yesterday. I will have to brave the elements later today if I want to make muffins tomorrow. The stores will be closed tomorrow for a holiday. I think about having to drive, distrusting other people’s driving abilities in weather like this. I take pride in coming form the North where snowy weather is the norm.  The fact that stores are always busy before a holiday also results in poor parking lot etiquette. I smirk a little thinking back to a time when someone passive-aggressively drove by me and said, “dip-shit” as I was walking across the pedestrian cross walk of a parking lot. It had been a very long time since I had heard that expression. 

Here’s what I don’t have and what I do have control over in the above situation. I have zero control over the fact it’s a stormy winter day out, that it’s the eve of a holiday, that I live in an era and city where cars, big chain grocery stores and parking lots exist versus small town shops or horse and buggies. Nor, do I have control in how other people drive or the expressions they use to manage their frustrations. I do have control over whether I go to the store, how I get there (by foot or car, sadly I don’t have a horse), what time I go today (peak times or when it’s quieter), and if I respond assertively, passive-aggressively or something neutral. 

Now, think about the bigger, harder, more painful issues in life. It can be hard to understand or make sense of sickness, death or trauma. It can feel incredibly frustrating to have people you care about think and behave in a way that is detrimental to their health, happiness and relationships. It is easy to get sucked into thinking one can change people’s opinions or beliefs, or that if you do everything “right" it will somehow avoid the pains of death/illness that is a part of the human condition. Acceptance of only being able to control your own business is an important practice. Remembering this, decreases feelings of helplessness and hopelessness. These situations can still be painful, but engaging and accepting “my business” decreases suffering. It presents a different way to navigate the experience. After all, as much as one might try, want or think they can, one truly can’t make the snow storm stop happening, have certain family members/friends/clients think less destructively, make past traumatic experience somehow not occur or bring back to life someone dearly loved, as much as one would like that to happen. It’s tempting to want to think we can control these things, but we can’t. Thinking we can control everything, but it’s a cognitive fallacy. 

Using your voice and actions to manage your own business might not result in other’s respecting or listening to what you are trying to establish. You can’t control what they do with your assertiveness or needs. You can control what you do with their response though. Maybe you choose to not hang out with that person as often, or are more cautious in what you share with them. Maybe you choose to let the issue slide or implement a consequence that’s more drastic. There’s power in acknowledging and advocating for yourself, even if the best case scenario doesn’t occur from doing so. 

I invite you to reflect on who’s business you are trying to control. See what happens when you step out of God’s business as well as that of other’s and focus on your own. In some ways, it reflects the serenity prayer - focusing on what you can and can’t change, and the wisdom and empowerment of knowing the difference. 

Boundaries and the Bible

As a teenager, I remember feeling annoyed that I had to drive co-workers out to and from the children’s camp where I used to work. I felt guilt ridden and shameful for needing time to myself when other’s had a need I could easily meet. Back then, I didn’t realize that my need to have some alone time was a way of caring for myself. If you’ve ever worked at a camp, you know that having time to yourself is limited. By not practicing boundaries and listening to my needs, everyone suffered as I was unable to be fully available to my co-workers and campers. 

I recently met with a professor who taught me during my masters. I asked him if we could talk over lunch about boundaries and the Bible. I often hear and see, both inside and outside the walls of my office, individuals with much confusion, anger, guilt and shame around these two areas. Some are taught, directly and indirectly, that boundaries are selfish. That saying ‘no’ to people, means you are not being ‘loving towards thy neighbour’. That when we are wronged, we are simply supposed to suck it up and turn the other cheek. 

I wanted to shed some light on this, and perhaps, clarify what boundaries are and are not, by looking at three Biblical passages. Whether you intentionally practice religion or not, read on. Perhaps there are concepts you have heard or picked up along the way.

Belief #1 - Aren’t we supposed to give up our lives… take up our cross per say? 

Many quote Matthew 10:38-39 when questioning boundaries: 

Whoever does not take up their cross and follow me is not worthy of me. Whoever finds their life will lose it, and whoever loses their life for my sake will find it.”

One thing I learned while working on my masters is the necessity of studying Scripture within the context it was written in. In this context, Jesus is specifically talking to the 12 disciples, letting them know that the cost of following him may mean death. It was not uncommon for individuals to be killed for their faith during, and since, this time. This passage also lets the disciples know that by putting their faith in Jesus, even to the point of death, they will live on eternally (as per the Christian faith). That even thought they lose their earthly life, they will gain life eternally. 

This passage isn’t saying, let people walk all over you by living solely for other people. It is not saying, you must always say ‘yes’ to people’s request and tolerate their abuse. It is not saying, your life doesn’t matter. This passage is saying, “hey, this is the cost of following me. I’m being upfront about this… it’s your choice… and it is indeed a choice.” Choice is a crucial piece to boundaries, which brings me to my next point.

Belief #2 - Aren’t we supposed to turn the other cheek?

Matthew 5:38-42 says, “You have heard that it was said, ‘Eye for eye, and tooth for tooth.’ But I tell you, do not resist an evil person. If anyone slaps you on the right cheek, turn to them the other cheek also. And if anyone wants to sue you and take your shirt, hand over your coat as well.  If anyone forces you to go one mile, go with them two miles. Give to the one who asks you, and do not turn away from the one who wants to borrow from you.”

This passage is trying to get people to see that retaliation isn’t the answer. An eye for an eye only leaves two men blind, it doesn’t bring about reconciliation nor justice. This passage isn’t about promoting violence or perpetuating it. It’s urging people to settle issues instead of retaliating back and forth.

The part about going two miles instead of one, needs to be understood by taking into consideration the cultural customs of the time. The minimum requirement when ordered or asked to help a traveler was to go one mile. One, however, has the choice of travelling more if they so desired. This is an importance piece… choice. At any point after the customary one mile, they had the choice to decide when they wanted to stop. Boundaries aren’t boundaries if one is forced into it. That’s slavery. It’s not boundaries when one is forced into a behaviour due to a power imbalance, such as in abuse. One cannot turn the cheek on their own (deciding their boundaries), when there’s injustice, manipulation or coercion. 

Belief #3 - Jesus would have done it… aren’t we supposed to do what he does? 

I want to point out that in Matthew 14, a passage that shows Jesus practicing boundaries. Earlier in the chapter, his dear and beloved cousin, John the Baptist, was murdered by King Herod. After this happened, Jesus was saddened, got into a boat and withdrew to a private and solitary place. He took the time he needed until he felt ready to go back to the people waiting for him. He didn’t shove his feelings aside and say, “they don’t matter”. He took care of himself before returning to the crowds.  I’m sure you’ve heard this saying before, and as cliché as it might be, it holds true: You can’t fill someone else’s cup when yours is empty. Or, you can’t drive someone to the store when your car is broken. In order to help others out, we must take care of ourselves. This doesn’t mean you have to wait until everything in your life is perfect before lending a hand, but you need to know how much reserves you have left before giving some away.